Despite Abayev (3,15) and Shagirov (2,149) the comparison of PAK *śǝħV́ with PN *sag 'deer' is impossible for phonetic reasons. But there is an interesting parallel in Kartvelian (PK *šw-el- 'roe, chamois'; the comparison with NC see Trombetti 1923, 370).
Some EC languages also have names for roe or mountain goat which are hard to separate from this root and are possibly derived from it:
a) *ʎ_im-kV ( > *ʎ_winkV or *ʎ_inkwV) reflected in Av. ʎ:inkʷá 'mountain goat', Cham. ʎũka (Gig. ʎunka) 'roe, chamois'. Note the same notation ʎ- (as in ʎama) in Cham. (only MSU recordings of the word are known to us; the strong ʎ:- in Av. presupposes the same consonant in Andian languages). A recent loan from Andian (Cham. or Tindi, where the root is not attested) is Inkh. ʎunka 'roe'. Less clear is the origin of PGB *ʎiga 'roe' (Bezht., Gunz. ʎiga) - is it an irregular development (with voicing -k- > -g-) from *ʎ_im-kV; or is it a Nakh loan (cf. Ing. lijg 'roe' with a diminutive suffix -g)?
b) *ʎ_im-tV ( > *ʎ_wintV) reflected in PD *xʷinta (Ak. hinta 'doe', Ur. hinta, Kub. xʷinta, Kait. šʷenta 'roe'). Borrowed from Darg. are Lak. hinta 'chamois, gazelle' and (from an Old Darg. form *finta) Av. pintá 'gazelle, antelope' (Chad. butá id.).
The proposed derivation of *ʎ_imkV and *ʎ_imtV seems probable to us; however, we must note that suffixes *-kV and *-tV are very rare, and more checking is needed to make a final decision on this etymology.
| Help | ||||||
|