Кетский:ɛllǝ5, pl. ɛllán ( < ɛlla:n3); South. ɛla5, pl. ɛlɨn5
Югский:ɛrfɔx5, pl. ɛrfɔxn5
Пумпокольский:élxan (Сл.), elxan (Срсл.) "door"
Примечания:ССЕ 187. Yug probably reflects a metathesis: ɛrfɔx < *ɛrxɔp < *erk-op. The word is probably a compound, but details are not quite clear. Werner 1, 230 <*ɛʎphǝq>.
Примечания:ССЕ 188-189, 204. Roots for "throwing" and "sowing" are probably to be united (although they are divided in ССЕ). Ass. pičiga and Ar. pis may belong here if p- is a class marker. One should also take into account that these Assan and Arin forms, as well as the Pumpokol one, may actually reflect a faulty translation, being very close phonetically to the words for 'evening' and 'dark' - see on that Werner 2, 173. See also Werner 1, 247-248, 249-250, 317 (forms meaning "throw", without reconstruction).
Праенисейский:*ʔes- / *ʔas- ( ~ *x-)
Значение:to poke, mix up (soup, porridge etc.)
Кетский:estij6
Югский:atčej5 (Werner 1, 75)
Примечания:Reconstructed as *ʔV[kč]- in ССЕ 203. The materials in Werner 1, 75, 270-271 somewhat clear things up: the Yug form is corrected to atčej (akčej in the original recording is probably a result of confusion with aqčej 'einsäuern' mentioned in Werner 1, 51, 75 - see *ʔaqV).
Кетский:iśaŋ (КРС), (Кастр.) ieseŋ, (Донн.) jes: iẹ̀s̀, pl. iẹ̀s̀ǝŋ [W.: īśa / īśe, pl. -ŋ]
Югский:ise, pl. isɨŋ [W.]
Коттский:ēči, pl. ēčaŋ
Примечания:ССЕ 188. In Ket the root was influenced by īś 'fish', from which it is historically quite separate (cf. in Kottish ēči 'scales' vs. īči 'meat' = Ket. īś, see *ʔise). Werner 1, 396.
Примечания:In ССЕ 189 the reconstruction is given as *ʔ[e]χ-; however, if we take into account the Ket form (adduced in Werner 1, 238) it should be rather changed to *ʔeχVǯ- (with an assimilation *eχ-ǯij > ej-čij in Yug, and with a regular reflex -ǯ- > -j- in Kottish). The Kott. infinitives th-ax, d́-ax show that we are dealing here with a frequent verbal suffix *-ǯ-. See Werner 1, 238, 239, 265 (without reconstruction).
Примечания:ССЕ 190. The comparison with Arin belongs to Werner (1, 181, 259-260, 2, 258) and is reasonable if we suppose a prefixed nature of t- in Arin and d- in Ket; however, the reason for reconstructing <*egǝl> or even <*egǝʎ> on the basis of this comparison stays unclear to me.
Примечания:ССЕ 190. Werner 1, 258 <*eʔǝphǝ>; however, attributing Kott. apaŋ here is wrong (see *ʔɔpVŋ; Werner, in fact, relates the Kottish form to two roots simultaneously).
